I've been a practicing astrologer for more than 16 years, specializing in astrology compatibility. Getting somewhat of a technophobe, I've largely avoided the web for much of that time. All very good points need to occur to an end however, so the following I am, now an avid on the internet reader and writer. When time permits I read and answer questions on numerous relationship astrology forums. Inevitably I read topics which go like this:
I'm a Leo, am I compatible with an Aquarius?
Answer One -- yes!
Answer Two -- no! I'm a Leo and I dated an Aquarius. We split up.
Answer 3 -- relationship astrology is stupid. I spent 172 hours researching that each and every sun sign combination has had divorces.
Each of these answers is wrong, yet typically every will get men and women agreeing with it. On forums exactly where votes are cast a single of these answer is typically specific as getting correct, and filed away for future generations of question seekers.
So what is heading wrong here?
It appears like whenever and in which astrology compatibility is discussed on-line that there is an assumption that sun signs are the key to astrology. I suspect that is largely as a result of the desire to simplify, streamline and condense everything. Astrology even so is really a subject in which simplification always creates problems.
The grim reality is that men and women are a lot more than just their sun sign, and in case you want a 'real' answer to an astrology question, then you'll need a actual astrology reading. Going just by sun signs is intriguing to get a rough notion of what to expect, but there are lots of other planets which can override and trample someone's sun sign traits. Every person and natal chart is unique.
This has led towards fascinating situation in which possibly 80% of all data about relationship astrology on the internet is basically wrong. To qualify that metric, if sun signs might be looked at inside a vacuum, then facts would be correct. In procedure (and individuals are asking these kinds of question to build real life decisions, and not as a hypothetical exercise) it's just not that straightforward.
One useful side effect of this looks being a smaller army of armchair internet astrologers, handing out parcels of neat and tidy information on all aspects of sun signs. Why do they do this? Because the thought of keywords mean that a capability visitor is not going to search for "Aquarius sun, Leo moon, Aries mars etc" - they are going to research for "Aquarius" - and woe betide any article which dares to lose focus by going off topic with qualifications. Something additional complex than which will result in the browsers back button being hit, and fairly fast.
Fair enough, perhaps this is happening in all subjects. On the internet education is clearly becoming led by the student, and the educators are telling them what they ask, and not what they have to know. Research engines effectively force websites to meet the need for instant gratification.
The dilemma for astrology is that this obsession with sun signs is degrading the credibility with the subject. Individuals are right to say "hold on, I'm a Leo and I don't get in addition to Sagittarius! This astrology stuff is worthless!" Are professional astrologers guilty of this too? Yes, we are. Mainly because otherwise, no one would read our articles! It would be pretty effortless however for astrologers to put a disclaimer or warning after answering articles or writing articles, and possibly that is the solution?
I'm a Leo, am I compatible with an Aquarius?
Answer One -- yes!
Answer Two -- no! I'm a Leo and I dated an Aquarius. We split up.
Answer 3 -- relationship astrology is stupid. I spent 172 hours researching that each and every sun sign combination has had divorces.
Each of these answers is wrong, yet typically every will get men and women agreeing with it. On forums exactly where votes are cast a single of these answer is typically specific as getting correct, and filed away for future generations of question seekers.
So what is heading wrong here?
It appears like whenever and in which astrology compatibility is discussed on-line that there is an assumption that sun signs are the key to astrology. I suspect that is largely as a result of the desire to simplify, streamline and condense everything. Astrology even so is really a subject in which simplification always creates problems.
The grim reality is that men and women are a lot more than just their sun sign, and in case you want a 'real' answer to an astrology question, then you'll need a actual astrology reading. Going just by sun signs is intriguing to get a rough notion of what to expect, but there are lots of other planets which can override and trample someone's sun sign traits. Every person and natal chart is unique.
This has led towards fascinating situation in which possibly 80% of all data about relationship astrology on the internet is basically wrong. To qualify that metric, if sun signs might be looked at inside a vacuum, then facts would be correct. In procedure (and individuals are asking these kinds of question to build real life decisions, and not as a hypothetical exercise) it's just not that straightforward.
One useful side effect of this looks being a smaller army of armchair internet astrologers, handing out parcels of neat and tidy information on all aspects of sun signs. Why do they do this? Because the thought of keywords mean that a capability visitor is not going to search for "Aquarius sun, Leo moon, Aries mars etc" - they are going to research for "Aquarius" - and woe betide any article which dares to lose focus by going off topic with qualifications. Something additional complex than which will result in the browsers back button being hit, and fairly fast.
Fair enough, perhaps this is happening in all subjects. On the internet education is clearly becoming led by the student, and the educators are telling them what they ask, and not what they have to know. Research engines effectively force websites to meet the need for instant gratification.
The dilemma for astrology is that this obsession with sun signs is degrading the credibility with the subject. Individuals are right to say "hold on, I'm a Leo and I don't get in addition to Sagittarius! This astrology stuff is worthless!" Are professional astrologers guilty of this too? Yes, we are. Mainly because otherwise, no one would read our articles! It would be pretty effortless however for astrologers to put a disclaimer or warning after answering articles or writing articles, and possibly that is the solution?
About the Author:
Astrology Compatibility - Why Sun Signs Trigger Confusion - Check Out aries and aquarius compatibility and aries man aquarius woman
No comments:
Post a Comment